Neither Confounding Nor Dividing: The Personhood of People with Disability



Abstract

In the society that makes ableism as a normal standard, self-autonomy is often identified with the personhood. The personhood of people with disability is often reduced because they are seen to be unable to perform their activities ‘normally’ without any help from others. All creations are relational beings because they are created by and in a relational God. The Church witnessed their faith, through Athanasian creed, that the Holy Trinity neither confounding the Persons (persona), nor dividing the Essence (substantia). Using Duns Scotus’s theory of haecceitas, I argue that every human being, even every creation, especially people with disability, possesses the thisness of their own that comes from the thisness of the relational Holy Trinity.


Keywords: disability, thisness, personhood, communion, doctrine of Trinity


Abstrak 

Dalam masyarakat yang menjadikan keadaan fisik dan mental yang able sebagai standar ‘normal,’ otonomi diri seringkali diidentifikasi dengan kepribadian (personhood) seseorang. Seorang manusia yang ‘normal’ adalah orang yang menguasai diri, dapat memutuskan dan menentukan pilihan bagi diri, mandiri, dan tidak bergantung kepada orang lain. Individualitas ataupun kepribadian orang dengan disabilitas sering direduksi karena orang dengan disabilitas dianggap tidak dapat melakukan aktivitas secara ‘normal’ tanpa dibantu oleh orang lain. Seluruh makhluk hidup adalah makhluk yang relasional karena diciptakan oleh dan dalam Allah yang relasional. Gereja menyaksikan iman, melalui Pengakuan Iman Athanasius, bahwa Allah Trinitas tidak bercampur dalam Tiga Pribadi (persona) dan tidak terpisah dalam Esensi-Nya (substantia). Dengan menggunakan teori haecceitas dari Duns Scotus, saya berargumen bahwa setiap manusia bahkan setiap ciptaan, secara khusus orang dengan disabilitas, memiliki ke-ini-an masing-masing yang bersumber dari ke-ini-an Allah Trinitas yang relasional.

Kata kunci: disabilitas, ke-ini-an, kepribadian, komuni, Trinitas

References

Basselin, Tim. “Why theology needs disability”. Theology Today. 68 (1), 47-57, t.t.

Charlton, James I. ‘Nothing about Us without Us’: Disability Oppression and Empowerment. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.

Creamer, Deborah Beth. Disability and Christian Theology: Embodied Limits and Constructive Possibilities. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Cross, Richard. Duns Scotus’s Theory of Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.

________________. “Medieval Theories of Haecceity” dalam The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, disunting oleh Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/medieval-haecceity (diakses 13 Mei 2018).

Cooper, Burton. “The Disabled God”. Theology Today. 175-182, t.t.

Davis, Lennard J. Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness, and the Body. London dan New York: Verso, 1995.

Dueck, Gil. “Reuniting Relationship and Vocation: Reflecting on the Divine Image” dalam Direction 45/2 (2016), hlm. 149-156, 2016.

Ellington, Scott A. “‘A Relational Theology that isn’t Relational Enough’: A Response to God and World in the Old Testament”. Journal of Pentecostal Theology. 19 (2010), hlm. 190-197, 2010.

Haymes, Brian. “Trinity and Participation: A Brief Introduction to the Theology of Paul S. Fiddes”. Journal of the NABPR. 7-18, t.t.

Horan, Daniel P. “Beyond Essentialism and Complementary: Toward a Theological Anthropology Rooted in Haecceitas”. Theological Studies 2014. 75 (1), hlm. 94-117, 2014.

Kelly, Brian. Gerald Manley Hopkins and Duns Scotus ‘Haecceitas.’ https://www.catholicism.org/gerard-manley-hopkins-duns-scotushaecceitas.html (diakses 13 Mei 2018).

Mikoski, Gordon S. “Better Together: New Perspectives on Human Uniqueness”. Theology Today. 72 (2), 227-233, 2015.

Pannenberg, Wolfhart. Anthropology in Theological Perspective, diterjemahkan oleh Matthew J. O’Connell. London dan New York: T&T Clark International, 1985.

Patterson, Sue. “Disability and the Theology of 4-D Personhood” dalam Theology and the Experience of Disability: Interdisciplinary Perspectives from Voices Down Under, hlm. 9-20, disunting oleh Andrew Picard dan Myk Habets. United Kingdom: Routledge, 2016.

Reinders, Hans S. “Being Thankful: Parenting the Mentally Disabled” dalam The Blackwell Companion to Christian Ethics, hlm. 427-440, disunting oleh Stanley Hauerwas. USA: Blackwell Publishing, 2004.

Siebers, Tobin. Disability Theory. USA: University of Michigan Press, 2008.

Sullivan, James. “The Athanasian Creed” dalam The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02033b.htm (diakses 18 Mei 2018).

Vos, Antonie. The Philosophy of John Duns Scotus. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006.

Ware, Kallistos. “Model for Personhood-in-Relation”. The Trinity and an Entangled World: Relationality in Physical Science and Theology. Disunting oleh John Polkinghorne. Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2010, hlm. 107-129.

Yong, Amos. “Disability and the Gifts of the Spirit”. Journal of Pentecostal Theology. 19 (2010), 76-93, 2010.

_____________. Theology and Down Syndrom: Reimagining Disability in Late Modernity. Texas: Baylor University Press, 2007.

Zizioulas, John. Being as Communion: Studies in Personhood and the Church. New York: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1985.

_________________. Communion and Otherness: Further Studies in Personhood and the Church. New York: T&T Clark, 2006.

0 comments:

Post a Comment